Why intel over amd reddit. Nope, not even remotely close anymore.

Why intel over amd reddit the reason why people recommend amd is because the 5000 series has so good single core performance. I would buy Intel if there was an compelling argument for them but as it stands I simply don’t see any need to. My experience with athlon in 2010 just showed other mobo problems, Intel is just a mature brand. So lot of casual gamers wanted this, and comparative gamers wanted Intel. In terms of Intel over AMD, Intel has the performance crown, AMD is just a budget part. These things take a long ass time to play out and Intel wont completely Intel had desktop system idle power draw as low as 27w (at the wall) over 10 years ago with Sandy Bridge when paired with a high efficiency PSU. I've purchased Intel platforms on two separate occasions over the past three years: A refurbished Dell Optiplex 7060 (I think?) with a Core i7-8700 that I bought as an office PC about two years ago. With IDM 2. Expand user menu Open settings menu. Intel also puts AI instructions and accelerators on their chips so it can perform better at learning than a normal CPU. AMD has the 3D cache thingamagig that really improves gaming performance significantly But those processors have been burning up recently if you're not careful. For a variety of reasons, breaking backwards compatibility is a big no-no for Intel/AMD, but far less so for Apple. I just don’t like Intel’s business conduct especially when it comes to market manipulation disinformation campaigns and AMD has had competitive products over the last few years so why not. Intel aren't perfect, as 14th gen proves but they have been very As a result, AMD could more easily cram multiple cores into a single chip than Intel, however they didn't have a whole lot of "excess" to implement SMT, whereas Intel did. With the AMD GPU and CPU designs, Microsoft and Sony have access to the full design, and can make make future revisions on future process nodes, which reduce cost/heat/etc. Log In / Sign Up; Intel MKL uses a slow code path on non-Intel CPUs such as AMD CPUs. PBO isn't bad though at 14800. Furthermore with Intel 14nm / 10nm issues, AMD reclaimed the single-threaded performance crown that is quite important to run some Python package (looking at you Pillow). Firstly Intel's arch hasn't really changed much in years so the optimisations are really quite refined by now. They have lower ST than Intel but good MT at lower cost. The only real advantage Intel has had, in anything, is "higher production capacity" and "many pre-existing customers with long contracts". Why would it be valued so much lower than AMD or Nvidia? They are delivering world-class chips, favored in many sectors - including server environment. As for where AMD has been crushing it for the last couple years: everywhere. AMD is nonexistent in these markets and consumer basically does beta testing with blown up CPUs. And way better iGPUs comparing to terrible Intel ones. As a complete average across all our tests, the Core i9 12900K scored about 8% faster than the Ryzen 5900X with DDR4 memory, or roughly 17% faster with DDR5. M. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. this is and has ALWAYS been the difference between the TWO, anybody who says otherwise are usually Intel or AMD Fanboys. Intel also uses a lot more different CPU sockets than AMD so it will be easier to upgrade later with AMD I know my intel cpu will be great for everything I do for the years to come. This is the only question, the answer: Because intel wants to bleed people dry for the smallest feature set they can, and are perfectly fine not innovating, and instead just refining the same old soup , over and over. It was under $1,000 for the entire system with an NVMe drive, a Radeon RX 550, and 32 GB of RAM, which allowed me to devote more of my budget to a better monitor. with Intel, the only one that's really worth it imo is the 12600k. I pulled the trigger on the AMD built purely because I got a deal on AMD side, making it a touch cheaper overall. I don't know exactly why it is, but AMD rigs can have their boot time tripled simply by moving a USB device from the rear I/O to front/case USB. 7800X3D or even 7900/7950X3D if you want best of both which are the top end AMD CPU's are generally cheaper and can be cooled with a 70 air cooler compared to either weaker intel chips 14600/14700k that still have similar TDP or the 14900k which needs a triple fan AIO over 360mm and can pull up to 4-5x the power of the top AMD chip, still loses out to it in gaming apart from Why this massive difference despite AMD CPUs performing pretty similarly to Intel CPUs. Ryzen 5000's increased clock speed overcomes this, but a large chunk. It's just means that whenever feasible I will buy AMD over Intel or Nvidia. C. Meteorlake also showed huge gains in Intels integrated gpu making it newly competitive with AMD's apus, so Intel can now compete with handheld PCs like the steam deck. This was the main reason Microsoft switched to AMD in the next generation of GPU's (and it is also why no one uses Intel CPU's anymore). Market cap is meaningless. Relevance Keep in mind that RAM latency is a synthetic number and meaningless without context. Intel learnt from their mistakes and they are improving since 10th gen, especially at budget end. That will soon be over due to Intel being equal or ahead with 18A. Your argument also skips the gigantic, glaring problem with Intel and why AMD has been on fire. AMD didn't beat Intel in single core until 5000 series. AMD launched Ryzen, which had higher core counts, and Intel was forced to respond to that by also upping their corecounts. I have looked around and ive always used Intels i9 & i7 series,However more recently alot of people and reviews say different things, about "what is best". And AMD don't provide drivers for older OSes like Win8. I almost pulled the trigger on a ryzen 3950X. For example, AMD CPUs have no issue keeping up or surpassing despite the latency. Is a 6 core part supposed to an 8-core die where 2 dies failed. AMD is barely in the same league as Intel or Nvidia at all in terms of market share. It was not that hard to see the light. Also ironically by reconfiguring their comparisons to favor Intel (mostly by favoring IPC over any threading beyond 2) even Intel vs Intel comparisons get weird. That doesn't mean that I think they always make the best products. Some terminology is different, sometimes motherboard manufacturers still use the Intel terminology with AMD boards, some don't: X. Intel is looking to become something completely different from AMD. Also, AMD have been gaining on Intel in terms of performance, power and heat. Intel processors run hot and need high-end liquid coolers, while AMD processors can easily be cooled with fans and heatsinks. P. So you can use the same hardware for both learning and inference. Why? Because AMD cpu and gpu are higher performance per dollar. The fact that Intel did this only after AMD did is why people blame Intel for holding back. AMD made the same mistake as Intel, before Intel did it. Intel is piling up inventory vs AMD’s inventory is depleting & ASP increasing as a result Intel is forced to sell unsold inventory for lower ASPs. Customer service is great and easy to deal with. Ryzen changed the game years ago, I was slow Several reasons. VT (virtualization technology) is actually called SVM for AMD. $800 CAD for Intel. Both of them still have some parts and components of their CPUs hidden and closed-source (such as their chips' microcodes), leading to the only kinds of laptops that are approved by the FSF as actually being "Free", having very old CPUs the like of Intel Core Duo, because of some new Inference is still done by CPU cores very efficiently and that's where Intel and AMD are best. 7800X3D basically performs on par with Intel and slightly ahead in some games If you’re shopping for a new desktop processor in late 2024, you’re probably wondering what to choose: AMD or Intel? Is Ryzen better than Intel, or does Intel still make better processors? In the Intel vs. Because I like AMD and don't like Intel or Nvidia. Typically, intel is better for someone who just wants to do work, though amd is better for someone that wants to do work AND gaming. Sue me for being a fanboy. Why Intel over AMD? More GiGahErtZ bruh! AMD CPUs' don't clock over 5Ghz. $ to $ AMD does better at rendering/things that use all cores, and Intel does well at everything currently. I undervolt cpu, and oc my cards . TL;DR: Why does Intel have weird core-count numbers compared to AMD? --- I really don't understand why Intel is using such weird core-count numbers compared to AMD. Fab is new division and needs to sign on external customers. Intel is also just straight up cheaper for the most of the last year. This is true. Having said that I got my CPU just before Intel came back with lots of higher core cheap cpus which could still be competitive but it wasn't the case when I built mine, started buying parts for it in November last year and was working in March this year. BIOS stability, which AMD doesn't have. That's 4 year into ryzen. On steam, Intel still holds 65% market share for processors, the GPU market share is growing and stands at roughly 8%. First ep is Adam, 2nd is Yvonne. it didn’t work. The thread scheduler has optimizations for both Intel and AMD. They certainly are not. I'm just curious to hear your stories and why you prefer one over the other. Is a 10 core part suppose to be a 12 core with 2 failed cores, and the same for the rest of those weird numbers? both trade blows across gaming and productivity, however right now imo amd ryzen offers the best value/performance and beyond that their mobos last much more time, unlike intel that changes more often and that over the same lenght of a amd mobo, quickly adds up very quickly on extra cost. AMD has better single core performance than Intel. But on the other side AMD has no CUDA which is why I still can't consider AMD GPU for my job with neural netwoks. AMD: Not as fast cores, more cores, not as expensive. Price: When I was buying in late 2023, the prices were about $500CAD for AMD vs. granted, benchmarks The only reason someone should go for AMD is socket longetivity and AMD cpus currently draw less power. ( AMD works fine by with Intel, and more importantly, NVIDIA doesn't work any better than AMD with Intel, that's misinformation. I won't get into the shady stuff Intel got to back then, it doesn't really affect how many have Intel or AMD systems these days, just a fun historical fact. That adds up over time. lemme know how the drivers treat ya Because for anything compute heavy, x86 still blows ARM out the water. I don’t need 12 cores 24 threads because I’m not rendering or video editing. The AMD microcenter bundles had WAY too many people complaining about RAM stability. "Compared to the AMD Ryzen 5000 series processors, the Intel 12th Gen CPUs hold a strong lead overall, although the exact amount varies based on the specific application. But my hunches were right. In 3 years I can probably give it a bigger uplift than I managed with the venerable LGA 1150 board which pretty much had to stay with the same Gen CPU it started with. You can't buy Intel leaks. Intel's offerings have been overpriced skylake refreshes for the past 5 years. A 13600K or a 13700K combined with a decent Z690 board will serve most folks well for 5 6 years minimum. Higher core counts were reserved for the server and HEDT platforms. Leaks are irrelevant and don't matter. Ryzen 3000 has higher IPC than Intel, but the clock speed deficit kept Intel on top. Cooling: I still got a fancy 360 AIO for the AMD but not having to deal with more fan noise because of heat is worth the money alone to me. Most YT reviewers will state it as : “just gaming? Get When it comes to hardware(not peripherals) they want the best. This is going to be a very long post with a TL;DR/conclusion at the end which aims to answer why Ryzen 3rd gen is one of the most significant developments in desktop processors in a very long time, why it's a much better choice apart from a few niche cases versus Intel's 8th and 9th gen CPUs, why Intel is now forced to lower prices if they want to remain competitive, and why they Can someone tell me why it is better to have a last gen AMD processor instead of an Intel one? I've been seeing many claims like Intel is killed by AMD, etc. More FPS in gaming compared to AMD (generalization). MacOS was always more efficient than Windows. Though no one should be Why: Intel is no longer sponsoring it UPDATE: It's rebranding as AMD Ultimate Tech Upgrade (The Budget may be more than $5000 USD). I've heard that often is better for productivity and power efficiency, and intel tends to shine more in gaming, although I'm not sure of that. I have had an intel core i5 3rd gen and an amd a10 7800b pro, both had This is why I went with AMD for my build last year. I would think that game developers are going to start optimizing more for AMD architecture though, with the new consoles being AMD powered and AMD working their way back in with their new lineup of cards. AMD CPUs have been the performance king for over 2 years now and algorithms like XGBoost or LightGBM run better on AMD given the sheer amount of cores. I only ever owned Intel processors. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Product division suffered due to Intel being behind TSMC for past 5-6 years. All I care about is performance. Intel stagnated hard at the time as well, which is why it was easy for Apple to make Intel CPUs look bad. And in all likelihood with AMD bringing both competition and innovation back to the market, the inevitable arms (hohoho) race between AMD and Intel (When they finally manage to sort their shit out) will result in x86 firmly reasserting itself in any segments where ARM is starting to intrude. Intel will have strong offerings in consumer and data center cpus. ), Graphics (ARC, Xe, UHD), Networking, OneAPI, XeSS, and all other Intel-related topics are discussed here. Outside customers are signing onto 18A so they have confidence. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app power efficiency, and rendering speed. I just built 2 5900x and 1 7950x with 6800 cards. There's at least three planned, but more may be made if the business team can reach a deal with AMD (That's why Yvonne is next, they want strong episodes first to show to AMD. i don't regret getting more cores over MHz. It's a joke haha I recently dumped both Nvidia and Intel. AMD only recently beat out Intel after 14 years of Intel dominance. It just makes no sense to buy an Intel cpu for sff unless you’re getting something like a 12100 and going super sff. Question: why do people here always recommend ryzen CPUs over intel CPUs when intel offers better gaming performance? I know ryzens offer slightly better performance in other areas but 99% of the time I see people gloss over the performance loss in games compared to intel. after that i restarted. I also think AM5 supports more direct PCIE lanes, if that's something that matters to you. Who remembers VIA chipsets for AMD? I have tried AMD over the years, but I always regret it as system stability and general issues are far more than with Intel systems. then i forgor that i factory reset my laptop and i didn’t have the acer fan control app thingy installed and then installed that, turned fans on highest, then called it a day. Nope, not even remotely close anymore. A 12600k or 12700k might be a decent option depending on price. Intel and nvidia are hostile for years just with their inflated price. . Off the top of my head, Ryzen clock speeds will vary by around 100MHz to 200MHz as a function of temperature without any custom clock settings, provided thermal throttling does not happen. 5800x3D for a cheaper choice or 7800x3D for a newer architecture, either are Last PC I've setup, I chose intel over AMD (it was about a year ago and at that point in time, it seemed to me like intel was offering better value for money with the 12100 than AMD - I still think it was the better choice). AMD uses chiplets, and communication between them is slightly slower because Yeah thats the core reason i DIDNT go AMD this time. Here we can see that when it comes to AMD vs Intel HEDT/workstation CPUs, AMD's final HEDT-only lineup holds the uncontested lead with 64 cores and 128 threads in its flagship Threadripper 3990X So if you have an Intel chip putting out 100W of power and an AMD chip putting out 100W of power, and all else is the same, the Intel chip will run cooler because it needs less of a temperature delta between the chip \ heat spreader and the heatsink to transfer that 100W. going by brands and choosing the older model is not very useful if you I prefer Intel right now because they have the fastest processors. A lot of my friends say AMD is better because they are cheaper for just as good performance, but I always see Intel in the PC Parts Picker that people make for this Reddit. So often, old(er) IT decision makers, often guys who have been in the sphere for a long time, will just go to Intel because it's literally what they always have done and they know they will get the job done and that there's a certain reliability there. Generally if an AMD build is booting slowly, it's almost always due to attached USB devices. The only reason I could say to get AMD over Intel at this moment is if you do photo/video editing and want to save time on rendering. Intel lost the 60-year advantage it had in process technology and over the past year, their problems have gotten worse. So my choice of Intel makes sense, because money is no issue and I enjoy Intel. AMD shaked the industry when ryzen came out. Their general rasterization performance is superior to Nvidia for every price point. Better memory stability compared to AMD (like we are still in 2017). They've given up ground since then, especially with their most recent desktop platform, Very brief TL;DR of Intel vs AMD (Ryzen). 1 while GTX 10 still gets new drivers. AMD is faster for cheaper when it comes to that, however, for gaming or any other task, Intel wins. For me the reason is longevity and stability. But AMD still does not All that means is that Intel will often have more product selections in the laptop space over AMD. 0, Intel is looking to become a foundry business and compete with TSMC mainly by manufacturing chips, instead of being a GPU/CPU/Product focused business like AMD or Nvidia. Asking the AMD vs Intel question on reddit gets you the same kind of answers. On the off chance that you are talking about AMD advantage laptops, like the Asus ROG g15, then all that means is that AMD CPU combined with AMD GPU in order to provide more performance. AMD has a much better product portfolio than Intel over the last 5 years yet Intel is still the market leader. Why streamers choose Intel over AMD ? why streamers choose Intel over AMD if AMD is better for multitasking like i have not seen or know a streamer who use AMD This thread is archived New Nvidia has traditionally had better driver support than AMD. AMD has a higher latency due to the fact that they are using a scalable interconnect architecture which allows them to use the same dies ranging from your budget 4-core to the top-of-the-line 64-core Intel's CPUs (i5, i7, i9, etc. The CPU is not the whole story. You get the smugness of not using Intel, and like, AMD CPUs used to be easier to cool. That was until AMD overtook Intel for the fastest gaming CPU with their Ryzen 5000 series of CPUs. There was the MKL_DEBUG_CPU_TYPE=5 workaround to make Intel MKL use a faster code path on AMD CPUs, That's a competitive edge over AMD. Fab wise, Intel is ahead of schedule for future nodes and will likely be ahead of tsmc within a year or so. Basically what it came down to was; a few years ago However, I recently decided to build my own PC and I did a lot of research on AMD vs. - currently AMD absolutely has intel beat on the performance per watt scale and the 15th gen would have to be a jump in power efficiency to bring those levels down. Streaming can be handled by the GPU, and most streamers don't do a lot of editing, rather just straight uploading the complete stream AMD has so many more options with their new processors. *Retitle: Im confused and about the big AMD and Intel and actual performances. To me it’s easy to pick intel over amd. Ive looked into the Ryzen 7 & 9 series (7000's) and they make similar or not more hardware performance than intels current gens (from what But why would a business choose an Intel server over AMD? Let's not forget Intel has been selling servers since the 80's. Intel: Very fast cores, expensive. Members Online China Deals a Blow to Intel's Turnaround A smaller instruction set isn't really an issue in itself, other than that it breaks backwards compatibility. Even on Intel Macs you could run Windows via Boot Camp. “The trend suggests Intel was caught off-guard by the level of market share loss over the past year. No more Intel and ncidia for me for a long time now. I see it in so many buildsAn Intel processor that is more money, with lesser amount of cores and even GHz. It's not just that. I don't hate AMD, my first GPU was an HD 6770 with 1GB of GDDR5. i remember uninstalling and reinstalling both, nvidea drivers AND intel drivers. for AMD, because that's AMDs own term for ram oc profiles. AMD coasted on the Athlon64 series, invested less into R&D, and then made a really terrible bet on Bulldozer by souping up its integer math and ignoring floating point performance while software was overwhelmingly moving towards needing FP performance, vector math, and lots of other similar optimizations. Yup, I don't get why people don't see it. Nvidia was and still is better than AMD's GPU's. Linus Tech Tips - I’m Keeping the World’s Biggest TV. The buildapc DISCORD or any bigger tech forums are way more helpful for a newbie, AMD marketing just liked to use the term "APU" to emphasize that their iGPUs are not total crap. You don't see many people hesitating to pick up an AMD processor over an Intel processor because they're almost seen as equals in the enthusiast market, and outright stronger in the server division at this point, but there's still trust to build and room to grow in the GPU world. AMD seems to do a better job working with their partners, Pairing an Intel 14900k with an Nvidia GPU yields the best performance in the majority of mainstream AAA games, AMD pulls ahead in specific games like F1 and not by a substantial amount. With an AMD CPU and an AMD GPU you get slightly more optimised Resizable Bar performance, but you probably won't Get the Reddit app Scan this Besides that both AMD and Intel CPUs turbo way past their “TDP”, 5600X has a max power draw of 88W if I’m not mistaken, whereas 12400 turbos to above 120W max, Intel is faster than amd. Come and join us today! Members Online. It seems ridiculous once you consider that beasts like the 13900K and 14900K can draw double the 7800x3d while getting similar performance, at least in gaming. Intel. i did but i don’t remember how. Apple has better single core performance than both Intel and AMD. We've also hit a point where fast cores just doesn't really matter all that much. People have shown lower tiers of the same gen sometimes show favorable results over higher tiers on the site. Intel should’ve been keeping up on core count in non-workstation chips so a little disappointed with Blue. That may take you over budget though. Intel may have a slightly superior processor but AMD is still the way to go when it comes to your cost to performance ratio Inventory levels & GM of Intel and AMD also show stark difference. Meteorlake roughly caught up with AMD's efficiency in mobile too. Except for the power efficiency and the price, what's the advantage of preferring AMD over Intel? would try an AMD processor but I can't see what's the clear advantage over Intel. Problem is, fast cores vs more cores is a debate heavily dependent on the specific application that's running and how well it's coded. It is also why AMD processors will vary their peak clock speeds as a function of temperature. Its why the majority still use Intel over AMD in the CPU department. is called D. That said, AMD processors are 4 times as power-efficient as Intel processors. So Intel and AMD are both pretty good when it comes to their support of open source stuff. Though performance wise, both have traded the crown over the last few generations so it's really a matter of preference and when in the upgrade cycle everyone is in. Intel’s lead architect left a few weeks ago - supposedly to join AMD (which is where he was prior to Intel anyway). Why AMD over Intel this time? The main thought behind Zen 4 was because of platform longevity. I’ve always preferred Intel over AMD. I have to say i have had crappy experiences with AMD in the past, and their CPUs in the past were generally kinda crappy with games compared to intel, but these days with X3D AMD seems. Intel does have some pretty good gaming CPUs, though my general rule is what I said above. With this strategy, Intel gets BILLIONS from the US CHIPS act while AMD gets basically nothing. Power: The Intel uses about 3x more electricity than the AMD. O. Second, they do have a few advantages in their monolithic design (the chip may be 8 core but it's a single piece of silicon) for things like cache latencies, inter-core latency etc. really good. I love my AMD cpu and don't see myself ever going with Intel, but after my one RX 590, I don't think I'll ever go back to another AMD gpu. Back in the Pentium 4 days, AMD actually had a solid performance lead over Intel. They don't all do it, but more often than not they do. You are mistaken if you think that AMD processors are cheaper than Intel processors. those are harder to find an require and LGA 1700 socket so your mobo options are limited. Intel/AMD actually convert the x86 instructions into a reduced instruction set in the CPU that then gets executed. - Intel JUST launched the 14th "gen" on an older socket type and while the CPUs are as powerful as the AMD cpus, Intel's LGA1851 is already planned to come next year. Even if the greatest amd graphics gars can have like 10 fps less than a nvidia 4090 I prefer amd. That's really the main thing Intel has going for it and why many system integrators still use Intel over AMD, they want to minimize after sale headaches. Intel CPUs are better for gaming, and can leverage Quicksync to help with video encoding They don't have to be good amazing at multithreaded tasks. The Intel stuff ends up throttling and/or performing like garbage while the AMD stuff is usually fine, baking at 90 degrees but not throttling. Took a while to tune, but that is why I bought them in the first place. Once had a AMD Radeon GPU, was fine too. Why intel over amd? Reply reply The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. My configuration had an AMD Ryzen 5 2600 as a CPU. Almost single article I've read claims that Intel is superior to AMD because it is Intel currently offers the best blend of performance and overall value at an affordable price, but troubling instability issues plague its 13th- and 14th-Gen processors with 65W or higher 1) AMD, especially the higher end ones (6300,8320,8350) are basically indistinguishable from higher end intel chips from a user perspective. Intel is better for gaming because higher Clock speeds and better over all single core performance. And even if they'd have TensorRT-like lib there are no AMD SBCs comparable to Jetson. AMD competition, the The difference is that for the past 3+ years AMD was the clear and obvious choice at almost all price points. CPU-wise, AMD's market share in the enthusiast market caught up quite a bit with the Ryzen 5000 hype, but that is still a drop in the bucket compared to all the computers used by businesses and home users, the enormous majority of which are Intel based. Why? Just because you have the better product doesn't equate to taking market share away and destroying the competition. I have 2 similarly specced builds, one Intel, one AMD, and they came out pretty similarly priced. And your battery life would literally be cut in half by just dual booting into Windows. There was a good post on wsb a few weeks back about it - obviously there’s a lot of speculation, but it’s plausible. Their marketing is more friendly towards the users. so intel embraced SMT (branded it as hyperthreading), and If anything, Intel is the team to watch because once they get their API support and rasterization performance in order, they'll probably end up beating both AMD and Nvidia at almost every price point. Skylake/Kabylake-X and Coffee Lake are flat out better than anything AMD has Look at benchmarks (the actually frames per second that people get) and you'll see why gamers usually take Intel over AMD. AMD is better for Multi threaded Applications. Now Intel has lead in ST and MT. Background on why I am asking this question: A buddy of a friend of mine recently told me, he wanted a new pc and asked me to configure him a system for around 750€ and later show him how to build it. With Alder Lake that situation has changed and now both have compelling options with Intel currently being ahead in most I am curious about why you picked intel over AMD (or AMD over Intel). krbuck ztbrwmfu ddoplv hhbxibn banzqs cioy xjzjp hxaqz knqel avfs