Roon vs jriver vs audirvana. Take away the pics and you have a bloated PO.

Roon vs jriver vs audirvana 8. Intro Contents 1 Audirvana. What’s your audio rig with which you can hear the differences? At first I was amazed of the AS SQ but after some weeks and checking A-B again vs A 3. Or if your DAC has a very good USB interface such as a Holo Audio May DAC, then you can connect your Roon Core directly to the DAC via USB. Save Share Reply Quote Like. 3. YMMV. But when it comes to SQ in very simple setup like a windows PC with connected usb-DAC/headphone amp (RME Adi2 dac fs in my case), I find Audirvana’s SQ a bit better. Roon as well. IDK, maybe Roon is stepping up it’s game a little because of the competition? I always say that competition is a good thing. 23, we Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. 50 € a month more you can subscribe to Roon, which plays in a different league. It is a good alternative to Roon if you are concerned about internet outage. If Roon does it as well as JRiver and with a better sound, I may end by subscribing to it. I love the curation and the subtle hand holding Roon does in addition to the sound quality. The first player has a great sound quality. 5 version update! Audirvana is on v3. Clearly, Audirvana was better, and you’ll immediately hear the difference. We will See in a few months if the glitches are fixed in Studio. Just I don’t like to have multiple players. The question we’d like to answer: is there a sonic difference? ROON versus Jriver versus Audirvana and Foobar. 5 and still active subscription for Studio Also I own Jriver Master Licence 28 and 29 I think Jriver has lot of useful functionality. No comparison. I don't need the For Windows 10 I have three players to recommend you. If you want this much Yeah, Audirvana is a hot mess. Regards. If SQ wasn't as good it would be a Tried Roon and Audirvana. We are the first to admit that many of the music streamers on our list are expensive. It just is. I have some questions for Audirvana users. Regular CD’s, 3,598,785. Tracks from my pc server, neutron decoding to PCM UPnP to my allo usbridge SIG. It is a very mature software with regard to features and UI, but Audirvana just made the music sound better (to me). Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Big step difference between Audirvana Studio compared to Roon. that’s going to be a battle Royale! We are [] Roon, the ultimate solution Volumino, elegant and free. Jud February 6, 2024, 10:17pm 143. Matt. He’s pulling your leg mate. We really didn’t expect that. Restored a backup hi! sorry for my bad English! classifying music Roon don’t have comparison but in my opinion, using Teac nt 505 the sound quality it’s more than better Audirvana for especially DSDs Audirvana know the device and get all possibilities, Roon only DSD -> DoP and others, and simply, all family knows the same, Audirvana it’s so better, and this is the question, why? Roon I tried this software for a week and now I am proud owner of Neutron for Windows, Audirvana 3. I have 2 AS subs instead. Business reasons. last weekend I migrated my Roon install from a Windows 10 desktop to a new NUC 10 i7 complete with new SSD. 1 Like. River is much cheaper but Roon has it's advantages. So I need to replace it and would like to upgrade to Audirvana Studio. 5 and as far as I am aware you can’t have both 3. 1. 2 is AMAZING as per sound quality, musicality etc. I have a bit of a theory about how Damien massages the sound of the playback compared to the Roon sound and it’s maybe not Roon and Studio are different worlds - with a certain part in common. To my great surprise I’m finding that A+ has now raised the bar for SQ. And unless I miss my guess, Reynaldo has similar reasons for doing the inline upsampling he does, and for requesting additional Audirvana capabilities in that regard. The bass fidelity may be partly owing to low harmonic distortion. AV is also Not long ago, when most home music servers used MacBook Pros or Mac minis, third-party applications like Amarra, Audirvana Plus, and Pure Music (or JRiver Media Player for Windows) helped to bring out the best in your collection of music downloads and, in some cases, offered integration of streaming services like Spotify or TIDAL. By the way, at Audiophile Style a similar poll showed a heavy preference for JRiver. Having finished my Roon trial a while ago, I continue to lurk around in order to follow discussions and, perhaps sometime in the future, get a lifetime subscription (I am too old school to support recurring subscription models for software). effischer OP. 8 massively wrong) TBH I’m happy with the squeeze interface on my Innuos as that also does everything I need. You understood what I wrote, I won’t waste any more time explaining it. lucretius September 19, 2021, 5:58pm 1081. Roon is all about information and discovery, which is great. JRiver has a remote It is incredible. But ROCK has full Roon functionality and on my i5 it is lightning fast! So far, I am undecided between AS and Roon. Roon is a thoroughbred when it comes to handling my music, while Plex is an old nag for the same purpose. I have JRiver and Audirvana- prefer the sound on Audirvana. Roon does not recommend connecting their server to a DAC for two reasons as I guess. But when I will have a better PC I will try HQPlayer. Roon is a completely different beast. JRiver is only partially stable. It sounds distinctly superior - more I don’t have a local library, all of my music is either Qobuz, Tidal, internet radio or vinyl so I don’t care about how well metadata is managed. Djm1960 November 19, 2022, 12:28am ROON – Audirvana – Foobar – JRiver. It feels like any of the of the myriad of other streaming services. There are a few older forum entries discussing the pros and . Audirvana Studio VS Plex The Roon journey I’ve been on over the last few days led me last night to Audirvana. VintageFlanker's Review Index. Brio by OraStream. I’ve used Spotify, Deezer and Tidal in the past. I play Jriver, Roon, VLC without the problems of Audirvana. Audirvana, for Mac lovers. 5 and the current Studio. That’s the idea, but hopefully we can elicit some informed specifics. Roon sounds the best if you use an NAA to decouple the Roon Core from your DAC. not even a burp I have mostly a similar experience with ROON and Audirvana. Even though, if Roon supports Bit-perfect playback and DSP setup, I didn’t get the same feeling of wonder, musically. In fact, I am a former user of Audirvana 3. By very far, Audirvana. Audirvana is excellent too. Ahdunno. Audirvana vs Roon. It has an Coincidentally, those (maximum DAC input rate, believing I hear a tangible difference) are two of the reasons I do inline upsampling. I can see how Audirvana could be better if you were to upsample. The issue we run in to is using something that has a strong sound signature and then tune our system around it. Here is an interesting comparison I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Since version 1. Interface Roon is the best. Since my old Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Details; Discussions; Posts; This discussion; Message User; 562 posts. It’s all down to futures and UI where roon is on another level. I still use iTunes to organize and run Audirvana in integrated mode. They sound quite different and even different major versions of Audirvana did. 5, which is great and even superior to Roon or Roon + HQPlayer, but under these conditions I ask myself: why, oh god, why would I adopt AS if it is sounding almost identical to its older I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Followers 0. I also chose not to upgrade Audirvana Plus to V. Roon is better than Audirvana 3. Member; Posts: 83; Roon VS JRiver VS ? « on: 2 Feb 2020, 07:08 pm Roon's been my favourite for library manager. When using bit-perfect (without any changes of the original) I call this ‘vanilla’ - the differences between A 3. To me Audirvana sounds way, way better than Roon. With UTP cable in between the 2 rooms. I normally avoid comparing two products this way as each may have strengths and weaknesses; therefore, a comparison might not work well in some cas I switched from a Roon ROCK NUC (modified USB output, linear power supply) to Audirvana Studio with Fidelizer and AO3 and i am completely blown away by the sound quality. lucretius July 9, 2021, 3:43am 387. Another_Audiophile May 19, 2021, 7:50am 35. But then, yep, to me AS then takes off when kernel mode on. 8MHz is 1. I can certainly say, on my Mac, that Audirvana is an improvement over iTunes. The Nyquist Fs of 2. Hi I am evaluating the trial versions of these two players - ripped music library is held on the same Mac and I stream Qobuz. i’m only talking about the sound I agree. Audirvana. I have Roon, its crap. Roon does that very well, and has lots of useful music discovery features, album artwork and sleeve notes, artist biographies, disc reviews etc. 51 (the earlier one without subscription) works fine without any problems on my Windows 10 system. I used @patifr - I generally have the same concerns with free trials and providing payment info, but I recently cancelled my Roon trial subscription (it just wasn’t for me) and I haven’t seen any suspicious activity on my credit card alerts. 5, now user of Studio : there is no point in continuing to use 3. There are many more areas where the 2 can I'm now using JRiver server, BubbleUPnP and a Primare NP5 as renderer at a fraction of the cost and am not missing Roon at all. That goes for both the old 3. The difference is SO BIG that I got it in the first 2 switches Roon vs audirvana vs jriver. Tried Audirvana a couple of times. It has for me (and my case may be unusual) the killer feature of finding my AVR on the network via UPnP and identifying that the DAC can handle 192/24. Some users report subjective improvements in sound quality with these alternatives. Live stream review - ROON - Audirvana - Foobar - JRiver. Hands down. So, using Audirvana gives a lot of potential for superior sound, but we need to ensure the rest of the equipment matches. Thanks for all the replies. Roon runs with full functionality on Linux for years on end. 8MHz DSD64 recording to 5. 0 everything is sounding too much like Audirvana 3. Audirvana is about sound quality. imadch: I have Chord Mscaler, which provides gentle upsampling. Both Roon and JRiver are “bit perfect” unless you intervene hence should be identical. I have a lifetime license of Audirvana 3. I think they do a two week trial too. 7 was good but they got 1. OffRode November 26, 2022, 3:22pm Hi, Audirvana team I know this will sound like a weird request, and maybe it’s a feature request more than an improvement request, but it would be nice if there were more “attack” in the reproduction of the sound envelope. OffRode November 26, 2022, 3:01pm 1231. 4 Likes The Roon journey I’ve been on over the last few days led me last night to Audirvana. 0 and I find the attack Derek, According to SA-CD. The ability to lock out the PC for sound only is a function of WASAPI or ASIO, not because of Audirvana’s unique algorithm. It's very competitive with the audiophile darling, Roon, when configured with the appropriate plug-ins, which is an That alone should disqualify what I might offer you. If i was to use a single PC or Mac directly conneted to my DAC without any remote device I would have sticked with Audirvana 3. Its not my fault they got in over their heads. DieterS August 5, 2021, 9:23am 446. Another disqualification. The management on the others was subpar and a few of them would Roon adds lots of features, but I find it very confusing when Roon changes the cover picture or genre of my local albums, for example. Basically how JRiver works. Hardware. They may interest you, if you don’t listen to Tidal or Qobuz. 2. As Waters points out, provenance details for these downloads is in The main advantage is that you run it headlessly. Yet I continue to have difficulties understanding the added value of Roon when compared to other audiophile solutions such as The small font size, however, makes some screens difficult to read. Once you spend the time to learn about the settings and dial it in both are fantastic products. 5 as long as one subscribes for AS, since I find the QS and the set of features better with AS. And Roon proceeds similarly. Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. For a few reasons really. I gave up Apple after the Apple ][ and the debacle that was Apple Pascal (which had a built in Disc Eating subroutine). But the interface can't compete i have both ROON and this Audirvana Studio(Trial Version) and the sound coming out from the studio is so good it’s almost holographic and so neutral and the tempo is quick too, compare to ROON w/c is really flat by the way. I think it is safe to assume that, everything else being equal, Audirvana (3. On my setting playing via an allo usbridge SIG running gentooplayer, the best sounding player IS neutron on my Android phone. bitracer March 5, 2022, 3:48pm 1165. It plays SACD ISO also The only interest in Roon I have because of support and great connection with Chromecast Audio and other chromecast devices. no Mylord, Roon ist nicht besser als AS. Roon for my music and Plex for my videos. 5を試してみて思った以上に良いと感じたので比較動画をアップしました。Audirvanaは他の再生ソフトの様にHP But what is the point of modulating a 2. Roon and Audirvana both end up sounding the same this way (to my ears). Please post your preferences and reasons for same. You might even prefer Roon to JRiver even just for your own rips. There are no subtleties or nuances to hear if the program functions correctly. If you already have a nice fancy endpoint that tickles your ears better, Roon can be a good addition. 7 & 1. ) using Roon IOS app (Core is a PC in a different room) to stream Qobuz to stream Qobuz to Bluesound Node via Wifi > analog output to amp People have been saying for quite a while that Audirvana sounds A casual vote saw preferences split between PureMusic and Audirvana+ with JRiver bringing up the rear again. Audirvana Studio tries to close the gap, but they are many releases away from catching up on stability, UI polish and features. I don’t know for streaming, but my friend who uses both AS and Volumio with local files, says that Volumio sounds better than AS. Whilst this works, I am not happy with this solution for a few reasons - (1) severe latency. Roon is about the ecosystem of streamers. For me, it’s a big letdown – you can’t even focus on composer by name so that only favourites will show (streaming through Qobuz). Roon surely has the advantage in terms of database organization but in terms of sound quality they are very close. Here's a thread on my experience with implementing Roon: Although Audirvana likely has equalled Roon in the sound performance department, it isn't a joy to use. MAME64 All these new-fangled games and controllers- I swear you need more than the 5 fingers on each hand God gave us . 5): Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum Audible difference in players? (Audirvana, JRiver, Roon, MusicBee, etc. The remote is just that it cannot play on the hand held device and hence BT in my case. nother 9 more to come. Which added up are just slightly more expensive compared to a single Roon license. 4 to 3. For contextI’ve got a Roon lifelong subscription and have long believed that Roon sets the standard for music player SQ. I’m not an audiophile and I don’t care about this, just love the music and the sound. Audirvana lets you edit metadata for albums and tracks in your local library. IMO, its sound is superior to Audirvana, Roon & JRiver. AS sounds so much clearer here compared to Roon. There are multiple linux distros other than wtfplay just for audio - daphile, Gentoo player etc. Kazuki June 12, 2021, 11:09am 300. 6 / 11. I use dBpoweramp for ripping, tagging and file conversion, and JRiver for library management and Hi, i own Audirvana 3. Last night I thought I’d give the updated Audirvana 3. Audirvana Studio tries to close But if we switch from Audirvana to Roon, we must confess: Audirvana sounds better (juicier, if you will). If there is a difference in SQ between Roon and Audirvana due to filtering then this will be easy to measure. Love the Roon interface. Yes I do expect Roon to do it, they said they would when I paid for it so I expect it. Still haven’t seen any measurements to support the opinion that Audirvana is superior and therefore should be considered just as an I’ll share my short experience running Audirvana 3 vs Roon 1. Reynaldo January 16, 2024, 11:53pm 96 @Cloclo When I used JRiver I always liked it in terms of audio. Like @Mike_O_Neill, I use both Roon and Plex - it’s a case of “horses for courses”. Derek From the Headfonia review of Audirvana: " Exclusive Core Player Like Roon, Audirvana articulates around a proprietary Kernel, made to “ensure the best digital audio playback performance from a computer”. reddog1 November 9, 2023, 2:09pm 7. 8 massively wrong) TBH I’m happy with the squeeze interface on my Innuos as that also does everything I I wasn’t fond of Roon at first but after installing Roon Server on my old Mac Mini and using my iphone / iphad as remote I was really impressed. PC, and there is no inherent difference when using JRiver. Space Invaders/Donkey Kong/Scramble are about my limit. Next Sunday – October 23, 2022 – we will go live again! This time we are going to compare various software packages. It’s been a while since I updated your license and I’m thinking about updating. I have compared Jriver against the latest Roon software (1. Separating from the house ground and having no measurable ground noise currents between components is excellent. River but Roon is very tempting. With the ROON promotion ending in Jan23 and reluctant to pay 15USD per month, I tried switching back to Audirvana. If Audirvana was as reliable as Roon, I would use it more often, but now I'm very tempted to remove Audirvana altogether. I think they all sound very good but overall I rate them in the following order: Roon, Audirvana Studio, Apple Music and Audirvana 3. bacmsl. Audirvana vs Roon: Roon requires an end point (at least in my case - Roon cannot see my AVR). Well I don’t have a 10k audio setup. After the advent of Roon and it's SaaS model and the explosive adoption of people paying for Roon as a service, Audirvana launched Audrivana Studio, a Roon-like sofware-as-a-service version of Audirvana, last year. It increases the bit depth of the sound to 64 bit before applying any operation to it, like adjusting It was started in 2011, which predates Roon by a few years. I did not have problems with crackling - only when using Kernel Mode (W10) and upsampling with r8brain (witch for me is the best of AS) I had problems when skipping tracks with different resolutions. Like JRiver can run on all sorts. I am a Microsoft Certified developer (retired) so yes I am biased and stuck on that platform but I have no regrets . This too is why this thread peaked my interest. 2MHz) and USB2 audio input. Since I use Qobuz too This thread is AS v Roon ? It seems to be about power hardware completely outside the remit of either software product DSD conversion protocols Roon so far has published 91 feature definitions, I assume a. No MQA, Tidal or anything else. Audirvana sounds much better than Roon and I prefer the interface to that of Roon 1. Roon and Studio are different worlds - with a certain part in common. Ironz November 26, 2022, 2:09pm 1216. I don't think that Audirvana is expensive but even if it was, it would be worth every penny. But Audirvana sounds MUCH better (wifi feed via UPNP to Roon-ready Lyngdorf amps into Quad electrostatics). I have an ESOTERIC SACD K-05X with a nice DAC built in (capable of DSD 2. It has connected me with music on a level I haven't had since I was a teenager The user interface of Audirvana does not even come close to Roon, but in terms of sound quality I like Audirvana more than Roon. Roon interface has the leg up for Music Software: Roon vs. After a few bugs at launch, I find Studio now very reliable with my configuration. Conclusion. Software? Right software. Roon and Audirvana support is good. I was opposed to subscription before trying AS. Not so much software on a media server. Who would want Audirvana Studio if you can have Roon for A promise from Audirvana that they will never try to implement something like Roon ARC in Audirvana. JRiver serves all my needs very well. You need a good DAC, I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. I also think Audirvana is better than BitPerfect, but the improvement is very subtle. If you’re going to keep the MACBook, Tidal or Qobuz apps are more than adequate to perform all the necessary basic functions. scotte1 January 3, 2019, 5:39pm 29. image 1380×690 188 KB. And one thing that I was baffled by was how much the sound quality of Roon improved when running Roon Server on a Mac Mini connected via ethernet. Seamless, hi-res, gapless, cover art, on-screen confirmation of bit rate, plenty of filters and what not if I want to mess I highly recommend the comments of Alec Kinnear on the following linked page, which greatly help to explain the in-built tweaks of the original Audirvana (which I have used from 1. Roon provides some extras that Audirvana lacks, such as song lyrics. But I have compared Audirvana, Roon and Amarra Luxe. 5. Both J-River and Roon handled my whole house streaming duties mostly well with some expected hiccups along the way. Reynaldo January 15, 2024, 11:41pm 93. Some like roon better. Now if you believe SACD’s are still viable, please enjoy the few you can buy. The difference is SO BIG that I got it in the first 2 switches between Roon and Audirvana (on the same track). Agree with you. Now as it pertains to JRiver vs. Not everyone needs or They have different interfaces, different options for streaming & the programming options are very different. JRiver vs. I’m using Studio 2. Most of my gear is Roon Ready and thanks to that, I could control every one of them, from the same computer. Thanks! 1 Like. On Sunday, Oct. But yah I am more interested in studio a year from True, and if Audirvana didn’t sound that much better than Roon, I would have chose Roon for it’s UX and feature set, even if I didn’t need all of the features. Seen lots of posts on the lack of progress on the main Roon playback experience due to the very high volume of time/effort expended on ARC problems. Hi I am evaluating the trial versions of these two players - ripped music library is held on the same Mac Audirvana Studio vs Roon. MikeO May 23, 2021, 5:59am 177. First of all it didn't sound any better than JRiver, and the deal breaker was that Audirvana couldn't do Folder view. I’m just curious to understand the principle According to Roon they paid for images etc for their databasesome 500K images. Roon’s presentation is clearer and better organized. (Audirvana, JRiver, Roon, MusicBee, etc. The sound was not as good as when HQPlayer played alone. You sometimes read some heavy statements on social media. JRiver. “Jplay is the best of them all”. Roon has a nice interface, but sound quality wise it’s on par with Jriver. But as a user of both systems for several years, I have To those who also use Roon, what are your thoughts on the update where you can now use Roon outside your home? Update: I just took the plunge and got the lifetime Plex Pass with the 20% discount. JRiver, for instance, modulates DSD files to any DSD rate with SoX. I tested Audirvana vs Roon and the last version of Audirvana 3. Here is an interesting article from Audiophile Style (f/k/a Computer Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. If it’s blue, Jriver is not altering the original bits in any way: The caveat, which I have experienced personally, is you have to be careful. 5 worst? Thanks. Roon is just a bit more rough and less spacious than its French competitor. As of now, even iTunes has WASAPI I mostly just needed audirvana or roon because I like to stream my music just as much as I download off Bandcamp and vinyl download codes and those 2 apps seem to be the only ones that natively integrate both qobuz and tidal with your local library (though for some reason you have to go on different tabs for audirvana unless you heart every single album you The original release version, AS 1. ) “ROON sounds like crap!” “JRiver sounds way better than Audirvana”. It was always a licensed local software client, not sofware as a service. show post in topic. A casual survey of the first hundred Google hits on “JRiver vs Roon sound quality” reveals a pretty even split between the two schools of thought. 2MHz DSD256?. It has simply no headroom management and volume is not turned down somehow automatically. A design like the Airlens should eliminate I'm using J. Don't expect to see much of a difference. J. Even with matched volume levels and playing through exactly the same hardware chain: Mac Mini > AudioQuest Vodka USB > Classé CP-800mkII > Elac ARF-51. I wasn't comparing Audirvana with JRiver. Doudou: HQPlayer, actually its full name is HQPlayer Desktop, is an audiophile player that is a derivative of a professional mastering application that is used in the musical industry, and whose name is HQPlayer Pro. I know. Well - maybe with a small part in common I started using Roon a couple of years ago. It’s a Russian audiophile player, and it does all what AS and Roon do, and much, much more, except streaming with Tidal and Qobuz. This digital playback process is the heart of the software and has been continuously improved over the last 10 years, on both PC and MAC. Roon Labs Community – 13 Jan 22 Roon v Audirvana. Next up onto the blind A/B testing block, a comparison that I too have conducted at home: Steely Dan’s Gaucho in DSD vs. One for audio (AS) and one for video (VLC) is enough for me. I would like the topic to focus on sound quality and for posts to address details about what the better sounding qualities are and the pieces and parts that make up the streaming system (from computer/computer software all the way to the DAC). Based on my statements JRiver wins hands down. I think @Antoine could give hope for a future update. If you have ASIO driver for your device, and it supports Native DSD, there is FWIW. And even though I Audirvana Studio vs Roon. 5 as well as the new Studio with a trial. What I hear from the Roon community, it is rock solid (as the name implies ). Take away the pics and you have a bloated PO. The problem with JRiver is that it has no streaming integration, so I use BubbleUPNP on my Android tablet to cast Tidal to my Windows PC. g. According to Roon they paid for images etc for their databasesome 500K images. Both are great products for my usage, I do use DSP for both and while on either sides site you continually see the “better” or versus argument I think it’s more about different than better. So I am a Audirvana's sound quality is at the same level as Roon which is as good as it gets today. seeing my Favorites from Tidal in one place, and editing works both ways, because I use my phone also with Tidal I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. LeeDongUk: I don’t know why we’re writing. What Roon has is the UI, it’s more fluid, it doesn’t freeze randomly and transitioning from one page to another is almost instant. 5/Studio) and Roon offer the same SQ. 5 in the past on an MacBook Air (bought in 2013), which is now on its really last leg. 5 and AS installed in the same computer. , and decided that Logitech Media Server was the best solution for I haven't tried Audirvana Studio, but did try out the older version of Audirvana when I was using JRiver 26. I do own both (Audirvana 1 & 2, JRiver 18, 19 & 20). If the music is played well it sounds correct, if not you can clearly hear glitches and breaks due to a non-continuous data stream. show post I am asking because when quickly toggling between Roonserver using phone remote and Audirvana studio, Roon server and AS sound identical when both are in wasapi. thebiglebowski May 23, 2021, 2:15am 174. But I tried it with an old version of Roon, Roon offers even a more detailed presentation than AS of the sound path during the operations. And inferior to Audirvana. 1. 5 and Roon I am disappointed. I haven't done a comp w JRMC but I find JRMC worse than Audirvana (on mac) and Roon about the same as Audirvana. I was going to mention Roon and Audirvana. Not that anyone who disagrees will be persuaded by testing, but Mitchco did a nice job of proving this: Computer Audiophile - JRiver Mac vs JRiver Windows Sound Quality Comparison I own valid licence for Audirvana 3. I've used it, Roon, and Jriver extensively and Audirvana is the only one that fails hard at the core concept of being a music player. Audirvana 3. matt November 18, 2022, 7:30pm 1188. In my system, Naim app sounds different than Roon, Audirvana sounds also different than the other two. , and decided that Logitech Media Server was the best solution for me. außerdem kann roon iso nicht From my POV, Audirvana ticks more boxes than Roon. Bill-99. Audirvana Studio vs Roon. If you subscribe to Qobuz or Tidal there are arguably better solutions, like Roon. Audirvana sounds much more spacious with full of dynamics and at the same time not so “nervous” as Roon. They are effectively bypassing this by having their customers grab images off the Internet. For streaming audio. 5 is better than Studio but it is veiled and lacking tone still. I think my sound is very good now and I can’t imagine a signifiant improvement from the player perspective. Whatever happens to Roon or my use of it, at least I have Plexamp to play my own music. 4MHz!!!The noise floor is inaudible and modulating to DSD128 or DSD256 does not add any new sonic information, than was recorded in the 2. For only 2. Audirvana's is very Amateurish. . Posted September 19, 2015. Music123 May 25, 2021, 6:28am 231. Sound quality is better than Roon on my system (even with HQPlayer as output, strangely). Sound quality Roon VS JRiver VS ? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Tried both audirvana 3. Disproportionate bigger to the difference in the subscription price So there is nothing to compare, the target of both products is separate. I used JRiver for about 5 years and switched over to Roon. 8 (1. I’ve dropped the Roon subscription, it will expire in June. Or the same players in the list you can try if they work. Poor JRiver. But for me, Audirvana has some nice features Tidal related (for e. However, Plex shines when it comes to handling video, and Roon is irrelevant for this purpose. So what could this actually mean? Audirvana sounds much better than Roon and I prefer the interface to that of Roon 1. It has for me (and my case may be unusual) the killer feature of finding my AVR on the network via UPnP and identifying that the DAC c Hi Thomas, ok, maybe. 5 for my taste but much closer than Studio is than either of them. Did all the stuff, copied files etc. Personally, I found all 3 (Roon, Audirvana and HQPlayer) sound better/best (subjectively) when the server is moved to outside the listening room and you just have a low powered endpoint connected to the USB DAC. Citizen of the Universe; Posts: 798; Review JRiver vs Roon « on: January 02, 2019, 11:44:10 pm Important to read: The best salesperson for a company is its customers. Audirvana has the most developed, cleanest interface with the most back-end stability that I've seen so far. Jud December 23, 2023, 6:48pm 25. I mostly use Roon because I like the app, I only wish Roon sounded more like the Naim app. The Origin version Roon vs JRiver. Also I think that AS has clipping problems when using upsampling. SSD drives are still very expensive, so I converted progressively during the last years my DSD files to DSF-WV, and with Covid-19 confinement I had I agree with your view on the sounds quality. I am currently sitting in hotel with a cold beer watching the later afternoon sun Audirvana has a remote app that I find a bit clunky overall and again significantly inferior to Roon. JRiver has very few bugs. No telling what days that will be 2. 5 and was on Roon for last 3 months with their 3 month 2$ promotion. I auditioned every music server application available over a two year period, that included Roon, JRiver, Plex with Plexamp, Navidrome, Ampache, Subsonic, Emby, etc. I think the SQ depends on your system. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:51am At first I was amazed of the AS SQ but after some weeks and checking A-B again vs A 3. And also on Alpha Audio itself. 0, on my system, which responds very well to upsampling, blew me away. Interface on JMRC can be tough unless you really get dialed in on it. Loving kernal streaming with r8brain upsampling to dsd 64. Some like AV. Sound Q is very good. 8), and Jriver is still better than Roon if sound quality is the only thing you care about. Overall, Roon wins hands-down on ease of use and the high standard of its interface. Hi Ramin. Can you say Lipstick on a Pig? People are star-struck on Roon because it curates pictures for artists. Recommended Posts. Thankfully, both applications include liner notes when available. Is it becoz in studio we have the option to choose kernel streaming? and ROON does not have this as i see it. JRiver is a robust media center with a focus on features, organization, and playback options. I prefer JRiver, but I do not use upsampling. 5 / Roon / Qobuz vanilla were very very little. One is spared from those bewildering Mac OS updates that might have an influence on your player software. The comment was addressing Mac vs. Reactions: Burning I think ROON is better than JRiver. I mostly go PC-Core/USB to DAC and then Balanced connections to my Yamaha Integrated and play You can try jriver or roon as they are known to play very well with network audio. Here’s my observation, Audirvana is hopeless at boxed sets but the key is making sure the tagging is 100% but even then it can be a mess!, Where as Roon 95% of the time recognises Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Tidal with Audirvana? I thought that the music was directly send to our DAC from the Tidal internet service and that is the DAC who had the job of decoded the track. I stopped using Audirvana Plus, Amarra, Clementine and iTunes. Foobar may be crude, but it's lean interface grabs some of us and it works like a charm. I know and appreciate some of you will find Audirvana works fine, you're fortunate that it works, and it must be something wrong with my system. But the price was high, and I was not satisfied at all with the SQ that I was getting from Roon’s integration with HQPlayer. Very interesting comparison: Matt. Read 2795 times. Many such comparisons were reportedly done the same way we did this one, JRiver (with certain skins) has an indicator to let you know the output is bit-perfect. net, there are slightly more than 6,200 titles available. X) and great If you only have your own music, JRiver is hard to beat, and worth every penny - it will last you a long time. 2791 posts · Joined 2003 Add to quote; Only show this user #3 (I found Pure Music to sound better to my ears than JRiver or Audirvana), but the player has become slightly buggy of late and iTunes has some behaviors that are somewhat annoying, so I took I think it is safe to assume that, everything else being equal, Audirvana (3. I am OLD , for reference 71 next week . Copy Comment URL I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. They say it does not sound its best as the server is heavy on the processor and impacts the streaming. Tried Euphony Stylus about a year ago on a dedicated server. By lotriwer September 19, 2015 in Software. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:48am #388. When I got into the audiophile approach to music listening six years ago I purchased two programs that have proved essential for my digital listening. B. Coojee July 8, 2021, 1:55pm 374. X. I even asked Audirvana support about it and their reply was sorry it's complicated to do folder view. Do you think that Roon is feeling the heat from AS? Author Topic: Review JRiver vs Roon (Read 4207 times) MikeO. Roon or Audirvana were developed to overcome the inherent flaws of streaming audio from all purpose computers, like your MACBook. its 24bit/96kHz PCM equivalent. 8 / 5. 6MHz DSD128 or 11. Now we certainly hear differences in software, but that is mostly firmware on a player itself. As far as the sound, I haven't compared Audirvana to Jriver so I can't comment on that. scotte1 January 5, 2019, 2:37am 30. Tried both and I don’t hear a difference in my system. lotriwer. The sound is very different among the two. 5 a good listen. Vs 2. Doudou July 6, 2021, 10:40pm 308. bitracer: Audirvāna on the Mac, for those that don’t have the patience to watch the whole video. 5 which makes about €310 laid out for buyers who started with v1. lucretius July 6, 2021, 10:34pm 307. For sound quality. Unfortunately, that's just the nature of this particular product category. Hi! I have used Audirvana 3. ScottieA: The ability to lock out the pc for sound only is definitely audible in my opinion on my equipment. Roon I use both on my main system, with AO and Fidelizer in Core and find them similar in terms of SQ since the incorporation of ASIO on ROON. Kenneth_Moreira May 18, 2021, 10:44pm 27. Doudou September 18, 2021, 1:14pm 1052. Now considering that we are all doing similar things for I have not tried stuff like HQP, Fidelizer , JPlay etc just vanilla AV apps like JRiver, Roon & Audirvana. Amarra is a mess, Roon is too expensive for just this application. Sound quality wise. Half are classical music. But if you don’t have - Audirvana is a great way of getting unfolded MQA straight to your AVR up to 96kHz -which ain’t bad at all. SoX is one of the DSP engines that are available in Audirvana, but it lacks this feature. (The AC frequency in the US is most often 60Hz. 8MHz the analog And I really don't understand the whole WASAPI vs ASIO vs Direct Sound vs MME thing. Audirvana has many. 2 Likes. Kernel Streaming has always been a headache. AS hat jetzt leichte Klangvorteile. The interface of AS is full of bugs and SQ is somehow artificial. By the way, my next review will be digital measurements of so-called bitperfect players: Audirvana VS fooobar2000 VS JRiver VS Roon. On top of this, we all know about it’s unmatched functionality. Yikes. Track and volume changes take a few seconds. Dave The transport can have influence on the sound and, since Roon is the only thing supporting RAAT, comparing RAAT to DLNA (I assume that’s what your JRiver set-up is using?) is more a comparison of two different transports rather than anything Roon Core or JRiver is doing to influence the sound. And more importantly they don’t mess with incoming bit-stream like Roon or Audirvana. The roon entire business model promotes selling roon endpoints/Streamers themselves and through their partners. Do be aware that they’ll charge a random amount (usually around $1 US) to verify the payment method when you sign up for the 今回はバージョンアップしたAudirvana3. You can’t lose much by giving it a shot. 5 but in my case Roon just offers a much better user experience. It's got a great interface (Studio, not so much 3. When I tried Roon, I did it very seriously, and I took my time to check every detail of the application. 2. show post in topic I don’t want anything messing up with audirvana 3. But with what I have Audirvana sounds the best here. The 2 products approach display in different ways and sound processing differently. So far Roon seems to be faster to navigate, less buggy and presents more musical info. The Tidal integration is smooth and great, and that Tidal integration carries over to the remote app seamlessly. 8MHz 1-bit A/D and because it is a 1-bit PDM signal running at 2. So for me, the subscription was not justified. Audirvana is also only two activations (hate this, I have three Macs I use often and another two I use occasionally). In my opinion Roon is nowhere near as transparent and good sounding as Studio Roon is much easier to navigate but also has it’s issues. I listen Old Fogie music. Audirvana is €98 now with €68 for a . I am currently using JRiver. Otherwise @amirm and others on Windows would just run foobar, which is Audirvana is an excellent app, sounds great, and doesn’t require 24/7 internet. Exploring other macOS music server programs like Audirvana or Roon might offer different user interfaces, organization features, and additional functionalities. Just for clarification: Roon is best and 3. ) I tested Audirvana vs Roon and the last version of Audirvana 3. Therefore, the Roon model is different from that of Audirvana. 5 and J Audirvana Audirvāna Studio vs Roon. Funny you should ask 😎 I auditioned every music server application available over a two year period, that included Roon, JRiver, Plex with Plexamp, Navidrome, Ampache, Subsonic, Emby, etc. Like Roon, it's not for everybody. jlfjlv13 May 18, 2021, Audirvana Studio vs Roon. But with all due respect to Audirvan, Roon’s world is definitely bigger. Studio. matt November 19, 2022, 10:42pm 1191. Mahler, Beethoven, Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath I know that the Audirvana sound is better but Why is a difference in sound between Tidal with Tidal app vs. Tough to beat According to Roon they paid for images etc for their databasesome 500K images. Audirvana with DMG Audio plug in EQuick is one that I use. Both Roon and JRiver allow for that. Roon has much better UI and feature set, but comes at a premium price. 06-20-2021 at 10:28pm . Home ; Categories No doubts, Roon is much more complex software with server side decoding and dsp, its own network protocol RAAT, excellent metadata handling. I have a JRMC25 master license, but it mostly collects dust these days. Check the settings on both , is volume leveling on for example , look for any DSP The difference between Audirvana and bit perfect is clearly audible – which is exactly why those who prefer Audirvana, buy it at €100 a pop. I never have a blip with JRiver into my Cambridge Audio CXN. Derek July 9, 2021, 4:48am 388. Sound quality Audirvana vs Roon: Roon requires an end point (at least in my case - Roon cannot see my AVR). Jr. Music sounds more present, dynamic and open. Have used it in a single server setup, dual servers and a few tweaks in between. There are things I miss about JRiver, in particular custom views, but the overall Roon experience is now good. 0. I am quite surprised how many positive reviews Audirvana Studio has received. Software that has layers of useless and redundant menus with avg sound at best. Audirvana plays all the formats you mentioned, but it does not support a very useful format which is DSF-WV, while Foobar, JRiver, HQPlayer , Roon and even VOX or Collibri, all support it very well. lucretius July 8, 2021, 3:13pm 376. Why 2 subs? I have 2 setups, so I don’t have to log in/out all the time while in the living room or in my office/game room. 5, Audirvana studio test period, Roon, foobar, jriver 26, Amarra luxe, hqplayer desktop, jplay and fidelizer pro. Price/performance ratio is heavily tilted in Foobar's favor vs. dmyxxrv phjqp knmlse hyf gem qwvn mdlq dvmlhn uux pgq